5 ms·
You can try Jitsi meet[1]. Open-source and with all the usual features. [1]https://jitsi.org/jitsi-meet/ https://jitsi.org/jitsi-meet/
by magriz 7y ago
You can try Jitsi meet[1]. Open-source and with all the usual features.
[1]https://jitsi.org/jitsi-meet/ https://jitsi.org/jitsi-meet/
- ketzu 7y agoThat's the only one I found so far, but we'll definitely check it out!
- Nihilartikel 7y agoI've recently set jitsi up. Its dockerized version is pretty easy to get working and supports ssl automatically if you have a domain name.
- gregoriol 7y agoIt's simple and works very well! maybe a little bit harder to self-host but definitely a top option!
- gregoriol 7y agoThanks to the other comments, I now think it's not that hard to self-host it :-) edit: still, self-hosted won't have the phone numbers to join the room
- hannob 7y agoIf you use it via docker compose there is nothing hard to self host. I literally tried this out within minutes. A few more minutes to put it on the normal port with a real certificate. https://github.com/jitsi/docker-jitsi-meet https://github.com/jitsi/docker-jitsi-meet
- lhoff 7y agoThere are .deb packages for Ubuntu and Debian available. I installed it on a freshly provisioned VM running Debian 10 in about 15 minutes. They even provide a shell script to obtain an let's encrypt SSL certificate. https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/blob/master/doc/quick-install.md https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/blob/master/doc/quick-in...
- hackandtrip 7y agoThe CPU usage of their web client is a pity, everything else is perfect.
- majkinetor 7y agoYeah, this works like a charm for me. I host daily with 5-10 people without any problems. Jitsi beats anything else ,including commercial stuff. You don't need any account, just browser.
- jeena 7y agoIt says that I should use Chrome instead of Firefox.
- jsilence 7y agoFirefox does have issues selecting the correct microphone device.
- phillc73 7y agoWe (the company/department I work in) setup Riot.im for chat/room based communication while everyone works remotely. As part of this, we added the Jitsi add-in for conference calls. At the end of day one I can say that Jitsi audio is pretty good. However, the video does seem to freeze quite regularly. This was in calls with only 3 to 4 people. I don't know if it's a Jitsi problem, or somehow an integration problem with Riot.im. Then again, because I can imagine that Jitsi has probably experienced astronomical traffic growth over the last few days as more and more people transition to remote working during the corona crisis, I don't want to be overly critical. I'll see how it plays out over the next couple of weeks. However, right now I'm not sure I'd want to use it for client based external calls.
- Arathorn 7y agoIf you’re using the default jitsi we provided, then yesterday it was incredibly overloaded. We are working on it currently; typically the video quality is rock solid.