3 ms·

Random guys on YouTube have saved me at least a dozen trips to the car repair shop; but there's all that noise I gotta sift through. Good luck and Godspeed sort

by d-d 7y ago

Random guys on YouTube have saved me at least a dozen trips to the car repair shop; but there's all that noise I gotta sift through. Good luck and Godspeed sorting through all the quackery if you ever come down with a rare health issue. There are so many junior-whatevers that flat out shouldn't be putting out content for anyone anywhere; much less the internet. It's a double edged sword.

weavie 7y ago
Overanxious patients coming into hospital thinking they have some horrendous terminal disease because they googled their symptoms is a well known phenomena.
toyg 7y ago
Maybe some topics should simply be legislated away as incompatible with “youtubery”: health and history, imho. Forbidding those would remove 90% of the problematic content (quacks, antivaxx, holocaust deniers, truthers etc). Health has specific laws to deal with digital storage, it’s not inconceivable to admit that it needs extra protection on social platforms too.
- HeyLaughingBoy 7y ago
  simply be legislated away This is one of the most dangerous phrases I've read in a long time.
  - toyg 7y ago
    Germany and Italy have had bans on specific material since 1946 and the sky has not fallen. I understand the concern, but the ban doesn’t need to cover all media, only the ones that are extremely accessible. A bit like pornography is forbidden on mainstream tv during the day, but you can still buy it freely elsewhere at all times.
    - HeyLaughingBoy 7y ago
      It's not about the specifics about your comment. It's a concern based on using the words "simply" and "legislated" in the same sentence. I'm of the belief that legislation is not something to be entered into lightly and should generally be considered a last resort if better solutions don't exist.
      - toyg 7y ago
        I do not disagree! My “simply” was just indicating a resigned acceptance that there isn’t a technological solution, so we might as well reach for good ol’ fashioned political instruments - with all the complexity those entail.
- lonelappde 7y ago
  It's already illegal to practice medicine without a license. Banning information sharing is not a solution.

by d-d 7y ago

weavie 7y ago

Overanxious patients coming into hospital thinking they have some horrendous terminal disease because they googled their symptoms is a well known phenomena.

toyg 7y ago

Maybe some topics should simply be legislated away as incompatible with “youtubery”: health and history, imho. Forbidding those would remove 90% of the problematic content (quacks, antivaxx, holocaust deniers, truthers etc). Health has specific laws to deal with digital storage, it’s not inconceivable to admit that it needs extra protection on social platforms too.

HeyLaughingBoy 7y ago
simply be legislated away This is one of the most dangerous phrases I've read in a long time.
- toyg 7y ago
  Germany and Italy have had bans on specific material since 1946 and the sky has not fallen. I understand the concern, but the ban doesn’t need to cover all media, only the ones that are extremely accessible. A bit like pornography is forbidden on mainstream tv during the day, but you can still buy it freely elsewhere at all times.
  - HeyLaughingBoy 7y ago
    It's not about the specifics about your comment. It's a concern based on using the words "simply" and "legislated" in the same sentence. I'm of the belief that legislation is not something to be entered into lightly and should generally be considered a last resort if better solutions don't exist.
    - toyg 7y ago
      I do not disagree! My “simply” was just indicating a resigned acceptance that there isn’t a technological solution, so we might as well reach for good ol’ fashioned political instruments - with all the complexity those entail.
lonelappde 7y ago
It's already illegal to practice medicine without a license. Banning information sharing is not a solution.