Yes! Sorry, my mistake. int then char on x86 will put the padding at the end of the struct, not in the middle. I had originally written it that other way (char

Yes! Sorry, my mistake. int then char on x86 will put the padding at the end of the struct, not in the middle. I had originally written it that other way (char and then int), then edited it to be the other way (int and then char) but didn't update the other text. I edited the post to have this correction.