3 ms·
> Why develop (a vaccine for a disease that is now non-existent?) Unless there's somehow infinite amounts to spend on research that's not viable whatsoever and
by ShorsHammer 7y ago
> Why develop (a vaccine for a disease that is now non-existent?)
Unless there's somehow infinite amounts to spend on research that's not viable whatsoever and actively diverting away funding from more pressing needs.
- H8crilA 7y agoThere are no more pressing needs than tail risks involving the entire population. But again, you leave it to markets and people that think in broken expected values and yeah it will seem like the project is stupid. Expected values make no sense when the system lacks ergodicity.