3 ms·
Wasn't there just a note a week ago about how they weren't going to attack the site, as they had better things to do?
by eggbrain 16y ago
Wasn't there just a note a week ago about how they weren't going to attack the site, as they had better things to do?
- s810 16y agoAnon's left hand never knows what its right hand is doing. Unfortunately Anon has thousands of right hands.
- evo_9 16y agoUnfortunately? Personally I say fortunately, more power to them. I just wish there was a way Anon could F with wallstreet, those clowns are next in line for a beatdown in my book.
- JonnieCache 16y agoFirst there was a press release calling for anon to attack the church of hate or whatever they're called. http://anonnews.org/?p=press&a=item&i=449 http://anonnews.org/?p=press&a=item&i=449 Anon shortly after released this press release calling it out as a hoax: http://anonnews.org/?p=press&a=item&i=494 http://anonnews.org/?p=press&a=item&i=494 To Anonymous: It's a trap. They've got their ports wide open to harvest IPs to sue. Don't DDoS, and boycott Operation Westboro. If you really want to continue messing with them, just send them a few male prostitutes and faxes of goatse. Nothing more. I think the church leader has since released a statement that literally said "bring it," and this is likely why they have now been owned. I imagine whoever did it made a point of covering their tracks very carefully indeed, I'll wager via simple wholesale destruction of the server. Some of them are definitely capable.