4 ms·
You can't ethically test a vaccine once a disease has disappeared so I'm not sure what you'd expect them to do in the SARS case.
by btmorex 7y ago
You can't ethically test a vaccine once a disease has disappeared so I'm not sure what you'd expect them to do in the SARS case.
- H8crilA 7y agoTrue. Can't you test on non-humans? Also, the vaccine was halted due to lack of funding, not ethical reasons.
- evan_ 7y agoNot if the disease doesn’t infect non-humans, or affects non-humans in a different way
- H8crilA 7y agoIt does infect cats, dogs, and bats (at least). And it seems money/interest was the problem: https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-care/scientists-were-close-coronavirus-vaccine-years-ago-then-money-dried-n1150091 https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-care/scientists-were-c...
- roywiggins 7y agoI believe there is or was a mouse model for SARS.
- mellavora 7y agoInterestingly enough, dogs seem to have problems with chocolate (theobromine, actually). The only problem humans seem to have with chocolate are supply-related. Yes, you test on non-humans. But because biology is different, you then need to test on humans.