> Lots of epidemiological papers about the Wuhan epidemic use data from phone carriers (not the government) to track the spread and make predictions, and they w

> Lots of epidemiological papers about the Wuhan epidemic use data from phone carriers (not the government) to track the spread and make predictions, and they were generally pretty good with their forecasts. The numbers reported by the government are consistent with the forecasts from scientists. Please provide a source for this. I have not seen any of this data used. The data I see used is from the CCP's official data. > You can't lie about the numbers because every other country would detect an anomalous number of imported cases. This is absolutely false. Because flights have been suspended from China to most countries, and China itself has been on lockdown, the number of imported cases to other countries does not reflect the growth of the virus inside of China. > The absolute numbers don't even matter that much - what matters is the trend and the number of new cases going to zero. Look at epidemiology paper - they always assume only like 10% of infected cases are tested and confirmed. The epidemic really is coming to a close in China Please provide proof that is not coming from CCP. No offense, but there's no reason to believe you on this without providing sources. Most of what you have said smells like BS.