4 ms·
Compress your responses. A giant wall is not conducive of anything. Unconstitutional because there is no such thing as a "fair" cost for things, and when the s
by endorphone 7y ago
Compress your responses. A giant wall is not conducive of anything.
Unconstitutional because there is no such thing as a "fair" cost for things, and when the state intrudes on commerce in a capricious, arbitrary manner it is unconstitutional, as has been shown countless times in countless cases.
This isn't difficult. Though again you accuse me of misreading the thread. LOL.
- eesmith 7y ago"giant wall" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullshit#Bullshit_asymmetry_principle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullshit#Bullshit_asymmetry_pr... What part of the constitution are you referencing? Which court cases? I've looked for a couple of hours, but failed to find anything. Without something concrete, I will conclude your original statement about dubiousness is unsupported. Why are all anti-gouging laws necessarily capricious and arbitrary? Certainly some may be, but some are no less capricious and arbitrary than saying that 21 is the legal drinking age or that the speed limit on a given highway is 65 mph. Eg, "During a declared emergency, selling goods and services at a price that is at least 10% higher than it was immediately preceding the declaration." - https://consumer.findlaw.com/consumer-transactions/price-gouging-laws-by-state.html https://consumer.findlaw.com/consumer-transactions/price-gou... Anti-gouging laws are a subset of price controls. The US has had price controls before. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_controls#United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_controls#United_States . If what you say is true, then how are price controls constitutional but anti-gouging laws are not?