3 ms·
Oh no. Not everyone. He can't even get a publisher for his newest. https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/woody-allen-gets-canceled-again/ https://www.nationalr
by xhkkffbf 7y ago
Oh no. Not everyone. He can't even get a publisher for his newest.
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/woody-allen-gets-canceled-again/ https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/woody-allen-gets-cance...
- _jal 7y agoHe can publish on Minecraft.
- HenryBemis 7y agoAlthough I am in favour of them printing what they want, let's keep their poison away from children, unless Minecraft has age restrictions in their library.
- BryanBigs 7y agoHe could easily self publish. It's not like the government is forbidding him from writing; it's that other people don't want to be associated with it. That's not censorship.
- simonh 7y agoThat’s not censorship. He could publish it online or at his own expense whenever he wants, but nobody else is obliged to help him do it.
- klyrs 7y agoYou're confusing the freedom of association with censorship. If nobody wants to publish him, it's either an ethical decision of people who don't want to associate with known rapists, or a business decision of people who don't think his works will sell well.