3 ms·
part of an account I heard of this somewhere else was that the turnover of employees was specifically between car manufacturers. Because they all paid more or l
by sixhobbits 7y ago
part of an account I heard of this somewhere else was that the turnover of employees was specifically between car manufacturers. Because they all paid more or less the same, if a worker got annoyed he would leave with no notice and go to a competitor.
Ford also refused to re-hire anyone who had previously quit, so the $5 was a great example of "Golden handcuffs". People would think twice before leaving, knowing they would be making 50% for the foreseeable future if they did.
- ClumsyPilot 7y agoIs a blanket ban on re-hires legal? It does not sound legitimate/legal. Surely a hiring decision should be based on employee skills/performance, and not punish general life choices?
- sixhobbits 7y agoI'm not an expert! But my impression is labour law was pretty different then and very employer focused.