4 ms·
I commented on one of the other threads that I personally think this strategy is nuts. I compared it to Dr Strangelove, but really I was thinking of the beginni
by gdubs 7y ago
I commented on one of the other threads that I personally think this strategy is nuts. I compared it to Dr Strangelove, but really I was thinking of the beginning of “Fail Safe” when the Kissinger-like figure argues that nuclear war could be winnable for the United States.
Making a decision like this without releasing all of the data and assumptions behind the model feels unbelievably cavalier. It affects the whole world.
A couple of months into this, my lowly opinion is: give us the South Korean response, please. What I’d like to see is massive global cooperation to manufacture a billion masks, and an absurd number of tests — combined with aggressive social distancing, public education, hand sanitizer stations, etc.
It’s interesting that the UK government rode to power on a wave of populism — yet are proposing a solution that requires full faith in elites, with little transparency into the data and assumptions. A very precarious time.
[edit: obviously the South Korean model requires faith in institutions as well — but to me they’ve been fully transparent from the start.]
- ghaff 7y ago>when the Kissinger-like figure argues that nuclear war could be winnable for the United States. Minor nit: It was at least widely assumed that Groeteschele in Fail Safe (as well as Dr. Strangelove in Dr. Strangelove) was deliberately modeled on RAND Corporation military strategist Herman Kahn.
- j8hn 7y agoDigital tracing also seems to be very helpful in the Korean response. Would you support your government to have a digital database of gps data, credit card transactions, and immigration entry information?