5 ms·
If your competitor can't restart his economy but you can then you have a massive advantage over them.
by radicalbyte 7y ago
If your competitor can't restart his economy but you can then you have a massive advantage over them.
- klipt 7y agoThat sounds like a terrible way to play the iterated prisoners dilemma. If the USA tries to screw over Germany like this, Germany could equally try screw over the USA - and they're the one with the vaccine company.
- TeMPOraL 7y agoChina is going to win this. USA mishandles the pandemic, blocks the EU-US transit way after it could help anything, and now pulls stunts like this. Meanwhile, China is restarting their economy, and is scoring points by sending teams of doctors and hundreds of tons of medical equipment to countries around the world, including two in EU. When the dust settles, I think Europe may end up reconsidering who to side with.
- ngcc_hk 7y agoAll along by not stopping in earlier stage. Good lesson to learn how to eliminate your competitor in the long run are we?
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- agoodthrowaway 7y agoChina’s handling of this is the reason we are all in this situation. They had a chance to contain it and they chose to shut down information that would have stopped the spread. Now the Chinese government are some kind of heroes?
- radicalbyte 7y agoThe screw up was caused by the lower level CCP trying to sweep the problem under the carpet. Once the big boys got involved it was taken seriously. As for instantly closing the borders: if you did that everytime a new virus popped up then you'd be closing the borders twice a year.
- TeMPOraL 7y agoI really don't get this sentiment. China fucked up their initial handling of the situation, but it took over a month for them to figure out that they're dealing with a dangerous new pathogen. These things aren't apparent from the first few cases that get discovered. Meanwhile, the rest of the world had two months of warning about the danger, and we fucked up worse. Blaming China for not containing it is ridiculous and completely unfair - I doubt anyone would've fared better. US handling of the situation in particular proves it would fare even worse (complete with suppression of data).
- madez 7y agoChina is run by an authoritarian extreme nationalistic government that tortures its citizen that dare to critise it. That is widely known. Europe will stay a close ally with the USA and the cooperation will resume to normality once the USA has recovered from its recent personality cult and government running on lies.
- Barrin92 7y agoThe US might recover in the sense of electing someone less clownish but I don't see this economic mercantilist trend in the US subsiding because it is gaining steam on both sides of the political spectrum. Warren for example, championing 'economic patriotism' has similar impulses and withdrawing from the world is now an equally liberal and conservative position.
- hatenberg 7y agoNone of this however is relevant in this context - what is relevant is that even with 3 months of warnings western democracies utterly failed to prepare. We love our freedom and our ideals but our execution sucks and it has nothing to do with China being authoritarian at this point. Taiwan is a democracy and they handled it just fine. No, we have elected clowns who tell us sweet lies we want to hear rather than the information we need to adapt to a changing world and now we have the worst aspects of both systems. Shit, in the US the local officials wanted to do the right thing while the dear leader screwed around blocking them, dismissed the scientists and acting uncontrolled and unchecked supported by his blindly loyal party officials and supported by his quasi-state-TV channel - that's like reverse China, the stupid version. We are really not in any position to give lectures right now. So let's stop shouting China is bad reflexively whenever our own faults are kicking us in the ass and actually demonstrate that our system is better - because right now, it is not - and a lot more people are about to die because of it. And right next there is a whole host of other risks queued up that will hit us in the same way- antibiotics resistance, resource exhaustion, pensions, climate change, etc. If this was the preview of how we will adapt to these challenges - ignoring them and letting them wash over us to not inconvenience the existing economy - I think China has a much better chance of adapting right now than we have. We are lucky in a way to get this virus as a reality check and not something worse... but even this will leave millions dead, many unnecessary due to lack of preparation during the time paid for with the lives of many people in Wuhan and failure to heed science.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- makomk 7y agoHow do you know that Germany isn't already trying to screw over the USA and the rest of the world? One of the first things they did is block mask exports to the rest of Europe.
- vsl 7y agoWhy do you think that’s screwing over somebody, rather than rationally protecting the very limited supply already insufficient for Germany’s own imminent need?
- tartoran 7y agoThis type of competition is harmful at this point. And deeply stupid. Cooperation needs to become a thing again.
- LeoNatan25 7y ago“Deeply stupid” is Trump’s middle name.
- ComputerGuru 7y agoIt’s not “at this point,” it’s “at this stage of world connectivity and interdependence” (where we’ve been for the past twenty+ years).
- globular-toast 7y agoLast time it happened was end of the second world war.
- saturday14 7y agoThe very fact that we are discussing this is super silly and shitty. The whole world should be working together, not competing with each other and not trying to screw each other over.
- tristor 7y agoPlease explain how that'd advantage the US? The US spent hundreds of billions of dollars to restart the German economy and rebuild Europe post-WW2 as part of the Marshall Plan. Modern Europe nearly owes its existence to the herculean efforts of Americans. There is absolutely no reason we'd try to stifle or damage Europe now. We are allies.
- foepys 7y agoI think Europeans don't trust this bond anymore since Make America Great Again and America First became the slogans of the US administration.
- NotSammyHagar 7y agoBut it will pass. It might take 4 more years the worst, but the us isn't becoming a nationalist authoritarian country. I hope. Sadly, I don't joke.
- whateveracct 7y agoYou realize the person in charge doesn't know what the Marshall Plan is and only know "the art of the deal."
- captain_price7 7y agoGood point on Marshall Plan. But "Modern Europe nearly owes its existence to the herculean efforts of Americans" - really? If you're talking about ww2, Soviet union had a far more important role to play. https://www.vox.com/2014/6/16/5814270/the-successful-70-year-campaign-to-convince-people-the-usa-and-not https://www.vox.com/2014/6/16/5814270/the-successful-70-year...
- KingOfCoders 7y agoWhen does this myth die? 70 years, is this version still taught where you went to school (US?)? "hundreds of billions of dollars" Germany received $14B (in 2020 $). Most of the money was loans and Germany made the last debt payment in 1971. The Marshall plan had three goals: 1.) Start the US peace time economy and help transition companies from wartime production to consumer goods 2.) Prevent communist influence in Europe by preventing starving Europeans 3.) Open European markets to US companies by reducing barriers and regulations. "The Marshall Plan aid was mostly used for the purchase of goods from the United States." --Wikipedia "Its role in the rapid recovery has been debated. The Marshall Plan's accounting reflects that aid accounted for about 3% of the combined national income of the recipient countries between 1948 and 1951, which means an increase in GDP growth of less than half a percent." --Wikipedia
- SideburnsOfDoom 7y agoThis is the kind of "zero sum game" thinking that Putin uses, i.e. "someone else losing is the same as me winning".