4 ms·
I agree with the OP’s assessment - as recently as two weeks ago, Libaom was too slow to even do quality testing on real footage. And that’s with forty modern Xe
by AndrewUnmuted 7y ago
I agree with the OP’s assessment - as recently as two weeks ago, Libaom was too slow to even do quality testing on real footage. And that’s with forty modern Xeon cores.
The fact that YouTube uses it only proves the increasingly obvious business model they use in the space, namely the monopolization of the encoding ecosystem by literally throwing away money to steer people clear of rav1e.
- clouddrover 7y agoThe practical reality is that libaom is benchmarked against routinely. It is the benchmark. See some benchmarks here: https://videocodectracker.dev/ https://videocodectracker.dev/ https://arewecompressedyet.com/ https://arewecompressedyet.com/