3 ms·
It isn't "clear" to oil executives and the coal industry that they're killing the planet. It's easy to revile oilsands, but how else are people going to live?
by latch 7y ago
It isn't "clear" to oil executives and the coal industry that they're killing the planet. It's easy to revile oilsands, but how else are people going to live? "Why can't we just be more civil and talk about it", they're thinking.
As a layman, the scientific consensus appears to be pretty one sides. The UN makes it clear that it thinks our current farming isn't sustainable (1) and that it's primary reason for the current mass extinction (2).
More recent NPR take on it (3)
(1) https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/sep/12/third-of-earths-soil-acutely-degraded-due-to-agriculture-study https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/sep/12/third-of...
(2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Assessment_Report_on_Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Services https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Assessment_Report_on_Bi...
(3) https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/08/08/748416223/to-slow-global-warming-u-n-warns-agriculture-must-change https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/08/08/748416223/to...
- BlackFly 7y agoThis consensus you are pointing to is the consensus that livestock is a leading cause of deforestation. There is no consensus that eliminating meat from all diets is the solution to that problem. There is also no consensus that it is the only problem. I have no idea what point you are trying to make with oil executives and oilsands. My general statement was in regards to the use of slaves (or indentured servants if you prefer) in the Arabic peninsula which doesn't seem to bother most people (because indeed most people aren't aware of it).