Well, when people have no quantitative risk metric to judge their actions by, how else do you suppose they explain their thinking? Would you have them say some

Well, when people have no quantitative risk metric to judge their actions by, how else do you suppose they explain their thinking? Would you have them say something like, "given the risk of inaction causing an incremental 2% infection cases among our customer population, we judged that imposing an added cost of $5 per employee and customer was a reasonable choice"?