3 ms·
What's wrong with just a real language as a build system? Speaking for Scala, everyone just uses sbt, which is just Scala. Nothing special about it. I'm not say
by smabie 7y ago
What's wrong with just a real language as a build system? Speaking for Scala, everyone just uses sbt, which is just Scala. Nothing special about it. I'm not saying you should use Scala to compile your C project, but maybe we could settle on some Lisp dialect or something for compilation, regardless of the language? That would seem ideal to me. Programmers in general have this problem of creating non-turing complete shit to solve problems that require turing completeness. And sometimes it gets worse: first a non turing complete language is created and then when it finally becomes necessary, some loops and shit are grafted on (or a shell script is called in the middle). It's a mess.
- pjmlp 7y agoEventually those scripts will turn into full fledged programs that no one knows what they do, specially since most of these build programming languages lack debugging features.