3 ms·
The linked paper https://fermatslibrary.com/s/proof-without-words-pythagorean-runs https://fermatslibrary.com/s/proof-without-words-pythagorean... gives you the
by chx 7y ago
The linked paper https://fermatslibrary.com/s/proof-without-words-pythagorean-runs https://fermatslibrary.com/s/proof-without-words-pythagorean... gives you the formula and I am much more a symbols guy than a geometry guy so I will prove it that way, first rearrange it:
(4T_n)^2=(4T_n+1)^2-(4T_n-1)^2+....(4T_n+n)^2-(4T_n-n)^2
Now, (4T_n+k)^2-(4T_n-k)^2=16T_nk (this, of course, shows up in the geometric proof as four rectangles where one side is 4T_n and the other is k)
so this is equivalent to
16T_nT_n = 16 T_n (1+...n)
which is equvialent to:
T_n=1+...n
But that is the very definition of T_n. Q.e.d.
Also if you want to take Pythagoras to a new level, Edsger W. Dijkstra who is much better known for his work in CS has a very interesting formulation https://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD09xx/EWD975.html https://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD09xx/E... proving sgn(alpha+beta-gamma)=sgn(a^2+b^2-c^2) which includes and extends the Pythagoras theorem.
- imglorp 7y agoWow, fermatslibrary has gone further downhill. It's almost unusable now with all the engagement stuff.