Your tone is really weird. No conspiracy is required in the case of a single company setting prices on its patented medical discoveries. Since you're so criti

Your tone is really weird. No conspiracy is required in the case of a single company setting prices on its patented medical discoveries. Since you're so critical of conspiracies, though, I'd (genuinely) love your take on something that does require a conspiracy: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/18/opinion/cost-insurance-diabetes-insulin.html https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/18/opinion/cost-insurance-di... (For me the Google amp link brought up the full article. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2019/01/18/opinion/cost-insurance-diabetes-insulin.amp.html https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2019/01/18/opin... ). Without a conspiracy, what keeps any drug company from selling cheap generic insulin in the United States? The reason I ask is that I really don't think so many companies can cooperate on price-fixing so I am looking for any other alternative explanation besides an illegal price-fixing conspiracy which I think would be very difficult to pull off among so many players and laws making it illegal. But the comment you replied to isn't like that and doesn't require a conspiracy.