4 ms·
In this case, Comcast is a nearly-Tier-1 transit provider that spends almost $0 on transit outside of interconnect/switchport costs. This argument doesn't reall
by iscoelho 7y ago
In this case, Comcast is a nearly-Tier-1 transit provider that spends almost $0 on transit outside of interconnect/switchport costs. This argument doesn't really apply. In fact, companies pay them for transit to connect/peer because they can't afford to not.
>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/05/comcast-is-the-one-who-should-pay-for-network-connections-cogent-claims/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/05/comcast-is-the-o...
>Comcast argued that it could be considered a Tier 1 itself, as less than one percent of its traffic requires transit.
>As Comcast's market power continued to increase and consumers had less choice, they actually started demanding payments for connectivity. A larger Comcast will be able to demand even greater payments.
As for T-Mobile/ATT, they are Tier 1 providers who again get transit for free. Spectrum is the only resource that is scarce in that scenario.
The same rules don't apply to the larger ISPs. This market is not fair.
- travbrack 7y agoParent comment is talking about link utilization and you’re talking about transit fees. You’re on a different wavelength (pun intended) Bandwidth is finite. Links can become congested.