3 ms·
While I'm sympathetic to that being your first parsing, it certainly seems a bit off to me. For example, if you pressed a button saying "Make myran a Cake" you
by encoderer 16y ago
While I'm sympathetic to that being your first parsing, it certainly seems a bit off to me.
For example, if you pressed a button saying "Make myran a Cake" you probably would expect it to give you a cake.
If it made you INTO a cake, you'd probably be in tiers. (Sorry, couldn't resist.)
- thalur 16y agoI'm not sure your example works because one would not normally expect a person to be turned into a cake, so the "give you a cake" reading is going to seem much more plausible. If the button said "Make myran a genius", what would you expect to happen?
- mryan 16y agoLike thalur says, the cake analogy is not entirely accurate, but you make a good point - the phrasing of the statement is ambiguous, and could be taken to mean two different things: Convert <item> in to <an object> Create <an object> belonging to <item> Given the ambiguity, FB should probably tweak the wording to make it as obvious as possible. Off-topic, but I am always impressed with how people share differing viewpoints on HN. It actually feels like a "forum" in the original sense of the word, instead of a shouting match between warring egos with something to prove.