4 ms·
While I would also be quite irate if I was in your position, it does not sound like this can be blamed entirely on FB. My first parsing of "Make <your name> a T
by mryan 16y ago
While I would also be quite irate if I was in your position, it does not sound like this can be blamed entirely on FB. My first parsing of "Make <your name> a Test Account" is that it means "the FB account with <your name> will be converted from a real account in to a test account".
Also,
> "To make a test account, register on Facebook as you normally would. Then, when logged in to the test account, go to this URL"
That also seems quite clear to me:
Create a test account
Log in to the test account
Click "Make <your name> a Test Account"
That being said, I do agree - this should have required more confirmation. This could have been avoided with a simple message box saying "Hold up, are you sure? <Your name> will no longer be a normal FB user. All <Your name's> friends will be deleted, and you will not be able to admin any apps. If you want a test account in addition to your normal account, you need to..."
- encoderer 16y agoWhile I'm sympathetic to that being your first parsing, it certainly seems a bit off to me. For example, if you pressed a button saying "Make myran a Cake" you probably would expect it to give you a cake. If it made you INTO a cake, you'd probably be in tiers. (Sorry, couldn't resist.)
- thalur 16y agoI'm not sure your example works because one would not normally expect a person to be turned into a cake, so the "give you a cake" reading is going to seem much more plausible. If the button said "Make myran a genius", what would you expect to happen?
- mryan 16y agoLike thalur says, the cake analogy is not entirely accurate, but you make a good point - the phrasing of the statement is ambiguous, and could be taken to mean two different things: Convert <item> in to <an object> Create <an object> belonging to <item> Given the ambiguity, FB should probably tweak the wording to make it as obvious as possible. Off-topic, but I am always impressed with how people share differing viewpoints on HN. It actually feels like a "forum" in the original sense of the word, instead of a shouting match between warring egos with something to prove.
- jtheory 16y agoHere's a super-obvious fix: Facebook should show you what they're deleting. It's easy to be confused about which user is currently signed in, even if you did create a new account you want to use for testing. So FB should have an intermediary step that says: WARNING: you are setting this account to test mode. That will involve DELETING its links to 354 friends (list some of them), 23 pages (list some of them), 5 years worth of status updates, etc.. Or simply don't allow an account to be set to test mode if it has more than 2 friends or 5 status updates (etc... some reasonable test).