2 ms·
You're even more compromised if you are removed. In the US, do you think companies have not moved manufacturing from union plants to non-union plants? Do you t
by fiter 7y ago
You're even more compromised if you are removed.
In the US, do you think companies have not moved manufacturing from union plants to non-union plants? Do you think they have not moved manufacturing out of US plants? Do you think this does not have to do with union membership?
I believe the adversarial view of unions and employers results in inefficiency and waste. I was suggesting an alternative view of unions and employers, but I believe I now understand you: you think this is impossible.
- dragonwriter 7y ago> You're even more compromised if you are removed. Unions (or their leadership) perceived as serving management are removed, invariably and swiftly, by their constituents, whether through decertification or leadership elections.
- fiter 7y agoI cannot tell if you are intentionally misreading my statement. If you are not, what I meant is that the union would be removed.
- dragonwriter 7y agoThat's what I am saying, too. I'm just saying that being beholden to management is a more certain way for them to be removed than being adversarial.