3 ms·
Maybe it can, but it doesn't do a thing. At least for me. Deconvolution of astigmatic eye lens image? Nope. Spatial superresolution by temporal integration? Nop
by red75prime 7y ago
Maybe it can, but it doesn't do a thing. At least for me. Deconvolution of astigmatic eye lens image? Nope. Spatial superresolution by temporal integration? Nope.
Low-level visual processing in our retinas and brains seems to be too specialized to learn new tricks.
- rini17 7y agoThe brain does all the time spatial superresolution by temporal integration! Look up "saccade". No idea about deconvolution, but I doubt computers can do better job identifying things from blurry images than brains.
- red75prime 7y agoSaccades are just compensation for low peripheral resolution and shortcomings of rods and cones. I had in mind getting more resolved images than what number of photoreceptors allows.
- rini17 7y agoThere are no "resolved images" that can be measured by pixels anywhere in the humans' visual system. Only talking about identifying things makes sense here, and that too, it is capable: "Because the disalignments are often much smaller than the diameter and spacing of retinal receptors, vernier acuity requires neural processing and "pooling" to detect it." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vernier_acuity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vernier_acuity