3 ms·
I saw different numbers, ~0.6% with good medical care(SK), 2-4% with poor medical care (Early stages in China).
by rocha 7y ago
I saw different numbers, ~0.6% with good medical care(SK), 2-4% with poor medical care (Early stages in China).
- bumby 7y agoAccording to the Johns Hopkins doctor recently interviewed by Sam Harris (sorry, couldn’t find the name) the South Korean number is likely the more accurate one due to a higher prevalence of testing. The higher rates from other countries are essentially a denominator problem (I.e., with limited tests only the most sick are tested, leaving the only moderately sick untested and thus out of the calculation)
- gremlinsinc 7y agoI've seen an infographic passed along, albeit on twitter, so authenticity is suspect --but it was comparing ages in SK and Italy of cases, where mortality is higher in Italy, because mean age was higher in Italy, a lot of the tests in SK were in churches where initial outbreaks were that were prevalently populated by youth... 2000x 20 year olds 2000x 60 year olds...and you're gonna have highly different results for CFR. I'd say it's somewhere in the middle of both... maybe something like 1.5. But I'm not an epidemiologist, but if the age gaps matter then it could be about that... just my thoughts.