10 ms·

What's Going on Under Norris Geyser Basin?

56 points by wglb 7y ago

kpozin 7y ago
Are we researching other potential global cataclysms to look forward to?
- Zhenya 7y ago
  "Should you worry? In a word, no. Activity like this is probably common at Norris and, at other times, under the caldera, too." - the article
  - elipsey 7y ago
    Also: "For those in the know, like you, that's awesome—not alarming." I feel like we have become unaccustomed to reading news that is awesome and not alarming.
  - PeterStuer 7y ago
    "Eh, it's probably nothing" Better duck into the nearest Wallmart and start mega-hoarding bog roll as evyone will do the same the minute they learn of people hoarding bog roll. XD
    - ethbro 7y ago
      I saw magma on the news, so I'm hoarding that instead! It's important to get ahead of the crowd.
doodlebugging 7y ago
Interesting article that basically answers the post title question by saying that utilization of improved sensors and data processing techniques have allowed us to determine that Mother Nature had a rumbly in her NGB tumbly that, over the course of more than a decade, she has been attempting to burp away.
sebastianconcpt 7y ago
Modeling of InSAR and GPS data suggests the 1996–2004 uplift was caused by an intrusion of magma about 14 km (8.7 miles) beneath Norris. When magma intrudes the crust it cools, crystallizes, and releases gases that had been dissolved in the melt. Gas escape lowers pressure in the magma, causing the surface to subside. That's probably what was going on at Norris from 2005 to mid-2013. But rising gases can become trapped under an impermeable layer of rock, causing the kind of rapid uplift seen at Norris from late 2013 until the M 4.9 earthquake in March 2014. It seems likely the quake created microfractures that allowed gases to escape upward again, resulting in subsidence that ended in 2015. The third uplift episode from 2016 to 2018 suggests rising gases became trapped again, this time at a slightly shallower depth. Modeling indicates the source depth for the 2013–2014 uplift was about 3.2 km (2.0 miles) deep, compared to about 1.8 km (1.1 miles) for the 2016–2018 episode. Should you worry? In a word, no. Activity like this is probably common at Norris and, at other times, under the caldera, too. What's different is that we now have the tools to detect and model Yellowstone's ups and downs better than ever before. For the first time, we've been able to track an entire episode of magma intrusion, degassing, and gas ascent to the near surface. For those in the know, like you, that's awesome—not alarming.
HocusLocus 7y ago
Express.co.uk has a Yellowstone bot that assembles a shrill article presenting copypasta facts in a tone of gibbering terror, every few days. 'Load More' goes on forever because they've been doing it forever. https://www.express.co.uk/latest/yellowstone-volcano https://www.express.co.uk/latest/yellowstone-volcano

56 points by wglb 7y ago

kpozin 7y ago

Are we researching other potential global cataclysms to look forward to?

Zhenya 7y ago
"Should you worry? In a word, no. Activity like this is probably common at Norris and, at other times, under the caldera, too." - the article
- elipsey 7y ago
  Also: "For those in the know, like you, that's awesome—not alarming." I feel like we have become unaccustomed to reading news that is awesome and not alarming.
- PeterStuer 7y ago
  "Eh, it's probably nothing" Better duck into the nearest Wallmart and start mega-hoarding bog roll as evyone will do the same the minute they learn of people hoarding bog roll. XD
  - ethbro 7y ago
    I saw magma on the news, so I'm hoarding that instead! It's important to get ahead of the crowd.

doodlebugging 7y ago

Interesting article that basically answers the post title question by saying that utilization of improved sensors and data processing techniques have allowed us to determine that Mother Nature had a rumbly in her NGB tumbly that, over the course of more than a decade, she has been attempting to burp away.

sebastianconcpt 7y ago

Modeling of InSAR and GPS data suggests the 1996–2004 uplift was caused by an intrusion of magma about 14 km (8.7 miles) beneath Norris. When magma intrudes the crust it cools, crystallizes, and releases gases that had been dissolved in the melt. Gas escape lowers pressure in the magma, causing the surface to subside. That's probably what was going on at Norris from 2005 to mid-2013. But rising gases can become trapped under an impermeable layer of rock, causing the kind of rapid uplift seen at Norris from late 2013 until the M 4.9 earthquake in March 2014. It seems likely the quake created microfractures that allowed gases to escape upward again, resulting in subsidence that ended in 2015. The third uplift episode from 2016 to 2018 suggests rising gases became trapped again, this time at a slightly shallower depth. Modeling indicates the source depth for the 2013–2014 uplift was about 3.2 km (2.0 miles) deep, compared to about 1.8 km (1.1 miles) for the 2016–2018 episode. Should you worry? In a word, no. Activity like this is probably common at Norris and, at other times, under the caldera, too. What's different is that we now have the tools to detect and model Yellowstone's ups and downs better than ever before. For the first time, we've been able to track an entire episode of magma intrusion, degassing, and gas ascent to the near surface. For those in the know, like you, that's awesome—not alarming.

HocusLocus 7y ago

Express.co.uk has a Yellowstone bot that assembles a shrill article presenting copypasta facts in a tone of gibbering terror, every few days. 'Load More' goes on forever because they've been doing it forever. https://www.express.co.uk/latest/yellowstone-volcano https://www.express.co.uk/latest/yellowstone-volcano