> Superdeterminism is much weirder and harder to accept than non-locality. I disagree, with the following example to back up why I believe it is less weird. S

> Superdeterminism is much weirder and harder to accept than non-locality. I disagree, with the following example to back up why I believe it is less weird. Superdeterminism can mean that faraway events can be correlated by a common ancestry. For instance: if you suddenly create a massive object, it will attract massive objects indiscriminately spherically; most points in space will be eventually affected, and so, they all are limited in the space of possibilities, no matter whether you can actually detect gravity. In the case of quantum mechanics, there may well be some currently-undetectable field similar to the gravitational one, which is very chaotic at a nanoscopic level, but that is severely constrained in the shape it can form, even across large distances. It is similar to how a large-space LCG (the PRNG) may look extremely random, but if you plotted consecutive numbers as coordinates across the complete cycle, you would get a lattice. Locally chaotic, but globally constrained. On the other hand, non-locality means superluminar information, which really breaks the common understanding of spacetime and of causality.