4 ms·
> That sentiment of "a real Python programmer" speaks to a mentality of in-group superiority, I don't agree with you at all. By the context, the term "a real p
by rumanator 7y ago
> That sentiment of "a real Python programmer" speaks to a mentality of in-group superiority,
I don't agree with you at all. By the context, the term "a real python programmer" clearly meanys a developer who actually has used Python in the past in a remotely significant way, at least slightly above the level of an intro to Python tutorial. Knowing the syntax is not knowing how to use a language.
It isn't elitist or classist to see red flags in a C++ programmer who fails to use smart pointers or doesn't understand the difference between pass by value and pass by reference. If someone passing himself as an experienced C++ programmer fails to allocate memory with new and just throws mallocs around, the reaction would be the same.
- speedplane 7y ago> the term "a real python programmer" clearly meanys a developer who actually has used Python in the past in a remotely significant way As a "real python programmer" that is trying to manage a conversion from Python 2 to 3, I can confirm that there is no superiority complex. We feel whipped and beaten, forced to convert a code-base that has been deemed "legacy" in exchange for a few nice string manipulation features that we don't really need. A "real python programmer" in 2020 is an abandoned class.