> Their writings hardly treat cars as one viable option as the majority of their writing is specifically against cars. How often do they criticize bicycles? Yet

> Their writings hardly treat cars as one viable option as the majority of their writing is specifically against cars. How often do they criticize bicycles? Yet cars are criticized every chance they get. Maybe this is the case because cars have far more negative externalities than other forms of transit. Like, can you even think of a legitimate thesis for an article about the negative externalities of a bike friendly community? > When have they ever proposed improving anything relating to cars? I find this ironic because many things they promote, such as improving transit and bike infrastructure, will actually make driving easier and more pleasant because there will be fewer cars in the road to create traffic