You make two attempts to sell your service in the article, while your entire premise is it’s “sinister” because Apple demands they be included as an sso option

You make two attempts to sell your service in the article, while your entire premise is it’s “sinister” because Apple demands they be included as an sso option if there are other options. I think you don’t understand what sinister means. And you’re casting doubt on Apple, indicating they may do something nefarious, simply because they are offering this. Yeah, this article is a sales pitch full of baseless accusations. I’m not defending Apple, I’m highlighting your fear-mongering to sell your service. If you have anything other than baseless accusations, please share.