5 ms·
That doesn’t make sense. Courts are independent (in theory) whereas HR is directly paid by and depending on the company.
by Ididntdothis 7y ago
That doesn’t make sense. Courts are independent (in theory) whereas HR is directly paid by and depending on the company.
- komali2 7y ago> Courts are independent (in theory) In the last couple years the {in practice} part has made this independence completely untrue.
- Angostura 7y ago> completely untrue. That would explain why the government never loses in court ever, ever, right?
- CriticalCathed 7y agoOne could argue that its merely lost to another government faction. Ala intra-aristocratic strife.
- denkmoon 7y agoPerhaps it could even be described as one part of the government applying checks and balances against another part.
- blfr 7y agoWhy, what changed in the last couple years?
- saghm 7y agoI don't necessarily agree with GP, but don't judges get government salaries?
- Ididntdothis 7y agoThe government consists of three independent branches of which one is the judiciary. You can’t compare this to a company which is basically a dictatorship.
- ClumsyPilot 7y agoI am not sure why you are being down voted, this is a perfectly accurate statement - and if viewed from a democratic perspectives, corporates are very dictatorial and mafia-like
- cfqycwz 7y agoThere _is_ a slightly looser coupling than an HR department, but the judges are still appointed and confirmed by politicians with pretty clear material interests. It's not so much a case of being "paid to rule the right way" as being chosen _because_ of an inclination to rule the right way
- lostcolony 7y agoIndependent in operation, but not able to perform their own hiring. The temptation to appoint sycophantic justices who have espoused opinions in line with the dominant party is high.