4 ms·
You could probably rephrase that into the 'stream of people that are interested in ideas and make new stuff and then actually do something about it' is thin.
by cgrealy 7y ago
You could probably rephrase that into the 'stream of people that are interested in ideas and make new stuff and then actually do something about it' is thin.
- zimpenfish 7y agoAnd you could retort "because of systemic unfairness in the US" since being able to do something about your ideas requires free time, money, etc. which many people just don't have rather than any intrinsic holy goodness in "founders".
- tasogare 7y ago> And you could retort "because of systemic unfairness in the US" One could retort that nice conspiracy theory to almost everything, and some people actually specialize into it. Now the thing is, having some constraints is a great way to get aware of a problem and try to solve it. This of course doesn't fit well with the whining mentality that some groups try to implant onto other for their own benefits.
- zimpenfish 7y ago> One could retort that nice conspiracy theory to almost everything In what sense is it a conspiracy theory? Look at what COVID-19 is already highlighting over there where people can't get tested[1], get no help for being unable to work, etc. [1] Unless, of course, you're a baseball team and then you can get instantly tested.
- lioeters 7y agoAnother could retort that systemic inequality, the economic and financial "game" being rigged, is not a conspiracy theory; it's not even a conspiracy - that's why it's called "systemic", behavior exhibited by a system, not necessarily by intentional collaboration of individuals (though that clearly happens also). To that a counter-retort may say, even if we acknowledge the "systemic unfairness" in the US, the country is leading the world as far as entrepreneurship and startups go.