How is this possible to justify when literally the state is supposed to be in a state of emergency and everyone is to avoid congregating in groups? Kids are li

How is this possible to justify when literally the state is supposed to be in a state of emergency and everyone is to avoid congregating in groups? Kids are literal Petri dishes and excellent vectors for virii. Public schools are doing parenting jobs instead of education. If their job is to provide ‘food, security and resources’ what’s the point if that means kids would become carries of illness? It always ends up with money. Public schools were always about money money and. Ore money. It’s a money pit where it’s never enough. And now we know why. It’s not for education, but for the care and feeding of public school coffers. [.. ] “After careful consideration and hours of consultation” and despite calls from parents to shut down to prevent the spread of COVID-19, the 132 schools serving 56,000 students in the district will remain open, said San Francisco Unified School District Superintendent Vincent Matthews. Even though the city has declared a public health emergency, schools are an essential service, providing meals, security and resources to children and families, Matthews said. “Keeping schools open outweighs the benefits of citywide closure,” he said. “Plans could change as the situation unfolds.” On Tuesday, the San Francisco Archdiocese announced it would close all of its 90 schools through March 25 after a Riordan High School student tested positive for the coronavirus.[..] [..] San Francisco school officials shut down Lowell High School for several days after the parent of a student tested positive for COVID-19. The school reopened today, but it’s unclear whether districts like San Francisco will be able to recoup state funding for the days a school is closed, if the closure was considered a precaution rather than the result of a declared epidemic. In Lowell’s case, that would be a loss of nearly $200,000 each day the school was closed.[..]