4 ms·
I was thinking the same. His arguments seem thin at best and suggest a misunderstanding of what OOP really means.
by optimuspaul 7y ago
I was thinking the same. His arguments seem thin at best and suggest a misunderstanding of what OOP really means.
- crimsonalucard 7y agoI would argue that a heavy practitioner of OOP, and one who does not see the extreme downsides of using that paradigm is actually the person who misunderstands Programming in general and what OOP is in that context. Say if you practiced procedural programming in a very heavy way and typed functional programming in a major way along with OOP then you would have a better picture. If you practiced OOP exclusively for the majority of your career I would argue your view point is flawed and biased. Over the years, as a programmer with a lot of heavy experience in all of the paradigms mentioned above, I have found that OOP is in fact not an apples and oranges comparison to other programming styles but is in fact a highly flawed paradigm.