That threw me too. Why can't the author appreciate Steve Jobs and respect his decision to not give to charity while also recognizing that solving first-world "p

That threw me too. Why can't the author appreciate Steve Jobs and respect his decision to not give to charity while also recognizing that solving first-world "problems" isn't at all comparable to what real philanthropists are focusing on? (The assertion itself is ludicrous enough without needing to mention it, but "either MacBooks and Disney or mosquitoes" is a false dilemma.) I agree it's delusional.