3 ms·
JDK 7 Developer Preview
- terinjokes 16y agoWhy are they sending the page with the "Content-Type: text/plain" header?
- y0ghur7_xxx 16y agoThey don't, at least not on my ff.
- barrkel 16y agoServer: Sun-Java-System-Web-Server/7.0 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:27:58 GMT X-robots-tag: index,follow Last-Modified: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:20:31 GMT Expires: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8 Content-Length: 22882 200 OK
- terinjokes 16y agoMust have been a temporary problem, seems like it's sending the correct headers now. (For the record, I had the problem in both Chrome and Firefox)
- hendler 16y agoFeatures: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7/milestones/ http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7/milestones/ List of general goals: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7/features/ http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7/features/ Dynamic languages should see a performance increase, apps requiring high concurrency : http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7/features/#f515 http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7/features/#f515
- tensor 16y agoIt's interesting that there is no Mac version of this. Perhaps an indicator that JDK 7 for Mac is going to be delayed?
- strmpnk 16y agoI've been using OpenJDK builds found at http://code.google.com/p/openjdk-osx-build/ http://code.google.com/p/openjdk-osx-build/. As far as I can tell, the OpenJDK project itself does not include the port as part of the JDK7 release but more so as a related project between Oracle and Apple.
- astrange 16y agoThe Mac OS X port will not be ready in time for JDK 7. It's more of a JDK 8 timeframe project. In the meantime, you can build it yourself; the only feature difference from bsd-port is i386/x86-64 universal binary support.