3 ms·
Must be related to employee rights, either something highly specific that is a dealbreaker to them (what would Austria have that Germany has not?) or it's a gro
by usrusr 7y ago
Must be related to employee rights, either something highly specific that is a dealbreaker to them (what would Austria have that Germany has not?) or it's a growing list based on precedence, likely full of permanently encoded biases depending on whoever was the initial candidate.
- usrusr 7y ago(edit: precedent, not precedence, if that wasn't obvious, sorry for the spam)
- aurelianito 7y agoIn Argentina, same pay for the same job is a constitutional right. If they hire someone here they would get a lawsuit asking for Silicon Valley payment.
- lbotos 7y agoIt's mostly related to employment entity complexity vs. organizational demand for that location. To operate legally as a business in most of those countries on that list adds complexity that leadership has deemed "not yet". Doesn't mean forever, just means, not yet. I've seen countries come and go off of the list. Source: 3.5 years at GitLab.
- usrusr 7y agoThanks. So it's a growing/shrinking list, because there surely are a lot of even smaller countries that would be added if something applied.