3 ms·
Can someone please explain if there's some semi-obvious subtext to the caveat -- that greater comparative transmissibility is NOT due to comparative longevity
by Jedd 7y ago
Can someone please explain if there's some semi-obvious subtext to the caveat -- that greater comparative transmissibility is NOT due to comparative longevity on surfaces.
Is there something else specifically, or is this just a general observation that greater transmissibility must be due to 'some other factor(s)'?
- mikekchar 7y agoThe longevity is exactly the same, therefore it is likely that the greater transmissibility is due to a different factor. I think that's the only reasoning that's going on.
- AstralStorm 7y agoLatency and silent cases is probably enough.