4 ms·
To me, that sounds like threatening the candidate to get him to waive his legal rights. I don't like the idea of working for a CEO who would do that.
by metageek 16y ago
To me, that sounds like threatening the candidate to get him to waive his legal rights. I don't like the idea of working for a CEO who would do that.
- aaronblohowiak 16y agoAh, I hadn't looked at it that way -- interesting perspective. I looked at it as someone who was between two desires and seeking resolution by increasing communication (which is generally a strategy that I condone,) however this might adversely impact the candidate so the hiring ceo gives them the opportunity for an out first. I didn't take this as a threat at all, but rather a measured approach that allows all parties to be on even ground and have their input heard.
- metageek 16y agoRight, but the employee is not on equal ground with the two CEOs.