3 ms·
That really seems like an adequate number of books for the large majority (90%+?) of users, esp when you consider that downloading another only takes seconds.
by tomkarlo 16y ago
That really seems like an adequate number of books for the large majority (90%+?) of users, esp when you consider that downloading another only takes seconds.
Before Kindle, did we complain that you could only carry a half-dozen books in your bag at a time? Not very often.
- chc 16y agoI thought the difficulty of carrying several books around was the Kindle's raison d'etre. I suspect you're right, though.