3 ms·
Except the article was never incorrect. You were. Twice. You didn't just say it was incorrect, you called it garbage; that's reactionary and ultimately makes yo
by ohyeshedid 7y ago
Except the article was never incorrect. You were. Twice. You didn't just say it was incorrect, you called it garbage; that's reactionary and ultimately makes you look foolish.
You're entirely free to continue behaving however you want, but noise will never be signal, and I'm much more interested in what you could contribute to a signal.
- mlyle 7y agoArticle was marginally correct, but he leaped upon the slightly-wrong-at-the-time-wording ("all games" when tonight's schedule other than Utah was still intended to be played) with way too aggressive language. Then fate turned around and made the article somewhat more true, when the last game of the night was cancelled due to refs having worked Utah games. (However, intervening games after the Utah game were played, so, it wasn't "all games" originally). Still doesn't excuse the commenter being a jerk about it and overreacting.