> Not classifying meetings that have never been classified before is not insisting on radical transparency. Agreed. I was referring to the principle of the thi

> Not classifying meetings that have never been classified before is not insisting on radical transparency. Agreed. I was referring to the principle of the thing, not this specific instance. > You're making the assumption there are more good decisions with bad optics than bad decisions with bad optics. Which seems like an unlikely assumption to be true. I think it might be true in certain situations, e.g. emergency situations like we're in now.