3 ms·
That's the tutorial challenge code, you get the `svelte:component` solution after clicking "Show me". https://svelte.dev/tutorial/svelte-component https://svel
by leppr 7y ago
That's the tutorial challenge code, you get the `svelte:component` solution after clicking "Show me".
https://svelte.dev/tutorial/svelte-component https://svelte.dev/tutorial/svelte-component
But yea that's indeed what I should have done in my example if I wanted the component to be reactive, as you can see that's even more verbose and still doesn't take care of props.
- xrd 7y agoI love this thread! And, isn't it likely this will be easier to support with Svelte eventually? My reasoning is that you just need to add a little syntactic sugar to the language and the compiler can add whatever code is necessary? With a runtime like React and Vue, it seems much harder to add in.
- leppr 7y agoIt's think it's likely the two issues I highlighted will eventually have syntactic sugar, I never wrote a transpiler but it doesn't seem that hard to support. It doesn't appear to be a priority though. > With a runtime like React and Vue, it seems much harder to add in. As a rule of thumb, it's almost always easier to add things at runtime than at compile time. That's why it took us so long to get Rust.