4 ms·
ah, not quite done right. The search interface really needs to be more like google scholar or web of knowledge (who really wants to type in "author:"einstein a
by rubidium 16y ago
ah, not quite done right.
The search interface really needs to be more like google scholar or web of knowledge (who really wants to type in "author:"einstein a" && year:1905"). Narrowing by field/discipline is a must, esp. for some keywords.
Also, just discussing abstracts is pretty lame. The typeface/links to citulike and journal are too small. There's no info on how many times it was cited, or what papers it cited.
Not to complain, but I'll wait for the next guy. This won't work.
- crocowhile 16y agoTruth is, that even if this was the best interface in the world, scientists would never spend their time discussing papers online. Facultyof1000 tried hard, Plos is trying hard, even nature tried hard to get people to leave comments to papers. It just doesn't work.
- mariuskempe 16y agoLet's hope.
- mariuskempe 16y agoYou don't have to type in the "author:" etc bits - searches work fine without them. Also, Google Scholar uses the exact same (or possibly a very similar) syntax.