3 ms·
Or, instead of issuing unclear vision, the state should just be issuing a blanket state ban on events larger than the x they want. If they don't want 999, clear
by threatofrain 7y ago
Or, instead of issuing unclear vision, the state should just be issuing a blanket state ban on events larger than the x they want. If they don't want 999, clearly they choose the wrong number. Many large events across the country still aren't being cancelled, and they're being cancelled in an overly ad-hoc manner.
Those without sufficient information shouldn't be making these moral gambles to begin with.
- chucksmash 7y agoExactly. In my life I've always hoped to live in a world where everybody used "do the most irresponsible thing legally allowed" as their lodestar. If there is a buck to be made, who am I to not make it??? "Common sense"? I got bills to pay!
- selectodude 7y ago>"Common sense"? I got bills to pay! Starving has a 100 percent mortality rate.
- chucksmash 7y agoLuckily no one has ever died of a false dichotomy.
- CydeWeys 7y agoA New Hampshirite will tell you otherwise.
- PeterStuer 7y agoYou forgot to put the '/s'.
- threatofrain 7y agoDo you care for common sense for social policy on viral epidemics? Common sense in many places means toughing it out is professionally normal, even if you're getting your coworkers sick. The same applies for kids in school. These kinds of medical judgments on viral epidemics are exactly where we want the government to communicate clear vision and leadership on emergency medical policy...