4 ms·
> who decides what’s [intolerable]? A fantastic first step is to eliminate anyone who reserve the right to unilaterally use violence in the name of religion.
by pinkfoot 7y ago
> who decides what’s [intolerable]?
A fantastic first step is to eliminate anyone who reserve the right to unilaterally use violence in the name of religion.
After that, exclude those who want a special deal for their faction that they wont grant others.
See, easy.
- mc32 7y agoThe word violence in common usage used to have a meaning. Now it can mean anything you want it to mean. There is no solid ground down this path.
- pinkfoot 7y agoFair enough: actual murders or direct threats thereof.
- mc32 7y agoCurious, does it imply people in prison for rape murder and assault should not be able to have a book written, what about providing an interview?
- pjc50 7y agoThis is already law in a lot of places. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Son_of_Sam_law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Son_of_Sam_law
- mc32 7y agoThat’s not the same. That says they cannot profit monetarily. So in this case of what’s his face had judgements against him, or indeed was serving a felonious sentence the state could seize proceeds. It doesn’t give them the right to censor publishing.
- monksy 7y agoThe usage of violence is already illegal.