> Dynamic languages are generally require less LOC, which generally equates to faster implementations That's not what I observed. My understanding is dynamic l

> Dynamic languages are generally require less LOC, which generally equates to faster implementations That's not what I observed. My understanding is dynamic languages promote people to think more higher level and care less about performance and program structure. While dynamic constructs can be efficient, the freedom they give is often misused by developers to create baroque structures that hurt performance mainly because developers don't know how to use them efficiently.