I don't think that's very actionable direction, because every post, no matte how dryly factual, can trigger someone who reads it. No doubt there is someone rea

I don't think that's very actionable direction, because every post, no matte how dryly factual, can trigger someone who reads it. No doubt there is someone reading right now who would react violently to a post about an experiment with statically-typed programming languages, and someone else who is still really unhealthily incensed about the War of Jenkins's Ear. All one can do is apply a reasonable-man standard: would a reasonable man think that a post is starting or perpetuating an ideological flamewar? I don't believe a reasonable man would think that about my post, which I believe falls well within the guidelines.