3 ms·
> And yet, sites exfiltrate enormous amounts of behavioral information. Whereas with a desktop app, I can just put it in a sandbox without network access and I
by gridlockd 7y ago
> And yet, sites exfiltrate enormous amounts of behavioral information. Whereas with a desktop app, I can just put it in a sandbox without network access and I am 100% sure that no data gets uploaded to anyone.
I don't see how that has anything to do with the security of the platform itself. Sure, some desktop apps can be sandboxed. Others don't work without some form of network connection. It's up to the developers what to (not) do here.
> While unfettered access has larger consequences, it is a relatively rare occurrence, whereas unwanted extraction of personal/behavioral information happens continuously.
A website or web app can not access any personal information that you haven't entered into it or its "partners". If cross-site tracking is your concern, there are ways to mitigate that.
- AnIdiotOnTheNet 7y agoJust as there are ways to mitigate the dangers of running desktop applications. Point is: Web is not inherently better for your privacy or security.
- gridlockd 7y ago> Web is not inherently better for your privacy or security. Nobody said that. The point I'm making is that it is not "fundamentally insecure and wrong", especially compared to native applications. As for security, there's some nuance there, but legacy desktop applications that are exploited can certainly do more harm than anything running in a web sandbox.