4 ms·
> ... but also inventivizing various approaches You may as well argue standards have lowered innovation. > Giving a company the right to prevent interoperabil
by teruakohatu 7y ago
> ... but also inventivizing various approaches
You may as well argue standards have lowered innovation.
> Giving a company the right to prevent interoperability does not necessarily mean they will invoke that right
I hope that whoever created int max(int a, int b) is benevolent because just about every programmer has reinvented that at some point. What about Response get(String url) which returns an HTTP GET response. We have probably all written that at some point and most HTTP libraries implement it.
- speedplane 7y ago> I hope that whoever created int max(int a, int b) is benevolent because just about every programmer has reinvented that at some point. What about Response get(String url) which returns an HTTP GET response. We have probably all written that at some point and most HTTP libraries implement it. FUD. You're using extreme arguments that traditional copyright law handles them well. API functions like "max" or "get" are so basic and general that they would not be protected by copyright law because they are not original "creative" works... a "max" function can only be written in a few ways that don't really rise to the level of creativity. However, a massive amalgamation of functions and classes, could be protected. I don't see any theoretical reason why they shouldn't, just practical ones based on what the software industry has expected as standard behavior.