4 ms·
FWIW, in the past I financially subsidized all of the costs of a clinic that served undocumented migrants (aka illegal aliens). They caught and treated countle
by droithomme 7y ago
FWIW, in the past I financially subsidized all of the costs of a clinic that served undocumented migrants (aka illegal aliens).
They caught and treated countless cases of Tuberculosis and even Cholera, which stopped epidemics in the community.
It's complete and totally psychotic madness, counterproductive, and will lead to the fall of society, to deny basic medical care particularly for epidemiological conditions to "illegal aliens". Societies that do so rightly fall.
I'm totally willing to accept and concede this woman is an "illegal alien", has no right to be in the Netherlands, is a criminal, etc. Maybe she is maybe not but let's get the bullshit out of the way and say she is for the sake of argument.
Should people like this be treated and tested for virulent plagues they reasonably might have or not? What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing so? The advantages of treating plague victims seem clear, let's tighten this up and you explain to me how citizens of the Netherlands benefit by denying simple and basic treatment of plague illnesses to people because of their status as an alleged criminal or not.
- wdb 7y agoDefinitely, she should be tested when the GP or RIVM thinks she meets all the symptoms/requirements for it. Never said she shouldn't! Apparently, they don't test you if you don't have at least 38 degrees temperature. Personally, I don't know the circumstances to make proper judgement. Only I commented on the statement the person wrote regarding being unregistered citizen.